901 F. Supp. 2d 129 - Slaby v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Herbert v. National Academy of Sciences · Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration · Coalition for Underground Expansion v. Mineta · Sinclair v. Kleindienst · 254 F. Supp. 2d 52 - Freeman v. Fallin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the defendant must present facts that will defeat the plaintiff's assertion of venue' " to prevail on a Rule 12(b)(3) motion, "the burden remains on the plaintiff to establish that venue is proper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the defendant must present facts that will defeat the plaintiff's assertion of venue'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be brought [i] in any judicial district in the State in which the unlawful employment practice is alleged to have been committed, [ii] in the judicial district in which the employment records relevant to such practice are maintained and administered, or [iii] in the judicial district in which the aggrieved person would have worked but for the alleged unlawful employment practice, but if the respondent is not found within any such district, such an action may be brought [iv] within the judicial district in which the respondent has his principal office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.