Sibbing v. Cave’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Statements for Purpose of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment. - Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sibbing v. Cave

2. “testimony as to what Dr. Saquib allegedly told her about the results of diagnostic tests and the cause of her pain does not qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule under Evid. R. 808(4) since the statements at issue were made by Dr. Saquib to Cave and not by Cave to Dr. Saquib for purposes of receiving a diagnosis or treatment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sibbing v. Cave

3. “should not be able to challenge the particular course of treatment chosen by the plaintiff's medical care providers to treat the injuries resulting from the defendant's negligence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sibbing v. Cave