Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 901 NW2D 199 - State v. Provost

State v. Provost’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Molina-Martinez v. United States · State v. Maurstad · Anderson v. State · State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood · State v. Amundson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessarily receive a similarly situated sentence within the presumptive range when resentenced with a correct criminal history score.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Given the great discretion vested in the district court in sentencing matters, we recognize that not every defendant who receives a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.