Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 901 NW2D 648 - State v. Christensen

State v. Christensen’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC · State v. Leake · Tereault v. Palmer · State v. Cole · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant is entitled to a new trial only if the verdict is legally inconsistent, as opposed to merely logically inconsistent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “proof of the elements of one offense negates a necessary element of another offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.