State v. Mohi’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 27 Cal. 4th 537 - Manduley v. Superior Court (2002), 21 Cal. 4th 628 - Warden v. State Bar of California (1999)
2 district · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Kent v. United States · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we must first determine what classifications, if any, are created by the statute. Second, we must determine whether different classes or subclasses are treated disparately. Finally, if any disparate treatment exists between classes or subclasses, we must determine whether the legislature had any reasonable objective that warrants the disparity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. MLC · In Interest of Zc“All laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Honie · State v. MLC“(a) promote public safety and individual accountability by the imposition of appropriate sanctions on persons who have committed acts in violation of law; (b) order appropriate measures to promote guidance and control, preferably in the child's own home, as an aid in the prevention of future unlawful conduct and the development of responsible citizenship; (c) where appropriate, order rehabilitation, reeducation, and treatment for persons who have committed acts bringing them within the court's jurisdiction; ...; (g) consistent with the ends of justice, strive to act in the best interests of the children in all cases and attempt to preserve and strengthen family ties where possible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. MLC · State v. M.L.C.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.