Lischka v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 775 So. 2d 408 - Boller v. State · 764 So. 2d 697 - Blue v. State · Adams v. State · 765 So. 2d 180 - Singletary v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he need for treatment and medication and the refusal to take medication despite a deteriorating mental condition, standing alone, do not justify involuntary commitment under the Baker Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D.F. v. State“Rather, there must also be clear and convincing evidence that without treatment, the patient would pose a real and present threat of substantial harm to himself ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D.F. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.