901 So. 2d 180 - Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · 608 So. 2d 784 - Fotopoulos v. State · 880 So. 2d 548 - Jacobs v. State · Westerheide v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“affirmative misadvice of trial counsel that if he testified in his own defense, the prosecution would be able to place before the jury the exact nature of the offenses of which he had previously been convicted. As a general proposition, such advice (if given) would have been incorrect under the Evidence Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garcia v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.