Yangco v. Yangco’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 601 So. 2d 534 - Pimm v. Pimm · 536 So. 2d 974 - Florida Bar v. Bell · Rahn v. Rahn · 567 So. 2d 916 - Zipperer v. Zipperer · 575 So. 2d 228 - Smith v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Alimony may not be reduced merely because the petitioner seeking the reduction has voluntarily incurred new financial obligations which make it difficult to meet his or her alimony obligations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.