Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 901 So. 2d 344 - Minus v. State

901 So. 2d 344 - Minus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Michigan v. Lucas · Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve · Commonwealth v. Joyce · 27 Or. App. 845 - State v. Jalo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Specific instances of prior consensual sexual activity between the victim and any person other than the offender shall not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 794.011. However, such evidence may be admitted if it is first established to the court in a proceeding in camera that such evidence may prove that the defendant was not the source of the semen, pregnancy, injury, or disease. . . . (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reputation evidence relating to a victim's prior sexual conduct . . . shall not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 794.011.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he standard for the admission of evidence that a criminal defendant seeks to admit . . . is broader than that of a civil defendant because of the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.