Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

901 So. 2d 425

Todd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-05-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2006

3 state decisions

Relies on Alford v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse the lower court’s order that denied Appellant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As the State concedes, the order is deficient because it fails to attach portions of the record that refute the claim. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for the purpose of either granting the relief requested, or attaching portions of the record which refute Appellant’s claim for relief. See, e.g., Washington v. State, 890 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHARP, W., PETERSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/901/so2d/425 · .json · Public domain