Hughes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
52 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The importance of finality in any justice system, including the criminal justice system, cannot be understated. It has long been recognized that, for several reasons, litigation must, at some point, come to an end. In terms of the availability of judicial resources, cases must eventually become final simply to allow effective appellate review of other cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen the United States Supreme Court or this Court renders a decision favorable to criminal defendants, . . . [w]e have held that such decisions apply in all cases to convictions that are not yet final that is convictions for which an appellate court mandate has not yet issued.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Frederic v. State · Cortes v. State“[T]he issue is whether such cases [as Apprendi ] can be applied to defendants whose convictions already were final when the decision was rendered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.