Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

901 So. 2d 939

Docket No. 4D05-592.

Alfonso v. State

Raul ALFONSO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-04-27

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2011

5 state decisions

Relies on Hardy v. Douglas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-04-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Raul Alfonso, Century, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing, if appropriate, either: (1) a Rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the credit for jail time, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); or (2) a properly sworn and pled Rule 3.850 motion, challenging *940 the sentence based on the failure to award jail time credit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(6).

¶5KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

/901/so2d/939 · .json · Public domain