Levine v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · 360 So. 2d 68 - Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service v. Vasta · 855 So. 2d 33 - Duest v. State · Daniel Mones, PA v. Smith · 771 So. 2d 32 - MCR FUNDING v. CMG Funding Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 1.260(c) addresses “any transfer of interest,” which necessarily includes the transfer of interest in a chose of action through a court-ordered auction. As such, under the plain language of the rule, after the transfer, the action may be continued in the name of the plaintiff. Substitution is not necessary, but the trial court may allow substitution upon motion by a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In case of any transfer of interest, the action may be continued by or against the original party, unless the court upon motion directs the person to whom the interest is transferred to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.