Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

901 S.W.2d 281

Rummel v. Hockensmith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Plaintiffs appeal from an order for summary judgment against their legal malpractice claims. We affirm. Because we do not discern any precedential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order, The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

/901/sw2d/281 · .json · Public domain