Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 901 SW2D 561 - Phillips v. Najar

Phillips v. Najar’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trezevant v. Rains · Guest v. Guest · Mortgage Bond Corp. of New York v. Haney · Short v. Short · Davenport v. Minshew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant has failed to challenge the validity of a handwritten mark intended as a substitute for a signature. Thus, insofar as he challenges the use of the rubber stamp, he challenges mere superfluous procedures apparently undertaken in an effort to redundantly comply with the statute. That use of the rubber stamp was unnecessary neither alters the validity of the will nor affects the sufficiency of Farr’s “X’s.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.