In re DeLeon’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Commonwealth v. Hamilton · Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America · Jacobs v. Halloran · James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) Except as provided in paragraph (C), within 180 days of the Board’s receipt of the Judicial Officer's written response pursuant to Rule 30(B)(2)(c) or written response to any subsequent letter requesting information by the Board, the Board shall: (1) dismiss the complaint upon a finding that there is no existing probable cause to file formal charges; (2) dismiss the complaint with the issuance of a letter of counsel upon a determination that, even if the alleged conduct occurred, it was not conduct which requires that formal charges be filed, provided that the Judicial Officer: (a) consents in writing; (b) stipulates that the letter of counsel may be used during proceedings involving new complaints against the Judicial Officer; and (c) agrees to and satisfies any conditions required by the Board; or (3) authorize the filing of formal charges with the Court of Judicial Discipline. (B) If the Board dismisses a complaint following a full investigation, Chief Counsel shall promptly notify the Judicial Officer and the complainant. (C) Exceptions. (1) The Board may continue a full investigation of a matter beyond the 180-day period set forth in paragraph (A) upon a good faith belief that further investigation is necessary. (2) The Board may defer disposition of a complaint pursuant to paragraph (A) upon discovery or receipt of additional, corollary, or cognate allegations which may necessitate an investigation. (3) The receipt of the Judicial Officer's written response to any R”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lokuta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.