In Re Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Matter of Addams · In Re Dortch · In Re Bingham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dismiss[ed] the Rule 1.5(f) charge as moot without addressing it on its merits.” Id. 10 . D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c) provides that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Lebowitz“intentionally, dishonestly and criminally misappropriated more than $260,000 from his client ... after her husband died.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.