United States v. Talbott’s Empirical Analysis
902 F.2d 1129 · 1990
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably 5 Cal. 4th 610 - People v. Wader (1993), United States v. Raynor (1991)
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5822 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on United States v. Isom · United States v. Warters · United States v. Fawole · United States v. Mclaughlin · United States v. Berry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Crime of violence” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16 to mean an offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or any other offense that is a felony and that by its nature involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in committing the offense. ****** Conviction for burglary of a dwelling would be covered; conviction for burglary of other structures would not be covered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“by its nature, [it] presents] a serious potential risk of physical injury to another,” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 cmt. n. 1 (emphasis added), directs the sentencing judge to consider the nature of the offense of conviction. Furthermore, the Commission instructed sentencing judges to consider the conduct “expressly charged.” Id. The Commission added the “expressly charged” language to the commentary accompanying § 4B1.2 in 1991 to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in changing his identity [because] he had been able to purchase firearms under a different name”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.