Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 1245

Docket No. 89-1479.

Auriemma v. Rice

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-05-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1990

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Auriemma v. Rice

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER

¶3A majority of judges in active service have voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,

¶4IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

¶5*1246IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment and opinion entered in this case on February 6, 1990, 895 F.2d 338, be, and are hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc on May 30, 1990 in the morning session.

/902/f2d/1245 · .json · Public domain