Chalkboard Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2015
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mathews v. Eldridge · Anderson v. Creighton · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Mitchell v. Forsyth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Supreme Court has made clear that absolute immunity depends upon the particular function performed by the official.” Chalkboard, Inc. v. Brandt, 902 F.2d 1375, 1378 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Butz, 438 U.S. at 508 , 98 S.Ct. at 2911 ), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 980 , 111 S.Ct. 509 , 112 L.Ed.2d 521 (1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“used by defendants in th[at] case could not reasonably have been believed to meet constitutional requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.