Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 15

Docket No. 88-1953.

Whitfield Pl v. Democratic Party of State of Arkansas

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 10, 1990. Decided May 4, 1990.

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2023

7 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Whitfield Pl v. Democratic Party of State of Arkansas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; G. Thomas Eisele, District Judge.

Carol Lani Guinier, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Tim Humphries, Little Rock, Ark., for appellees.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, MCMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In this matter, a panel of this court, Judge Bright, dissenting, reversed the judgment of the district court. Whitfield v. The Democratic Party, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir.1989). After rehearing en banc, the judgment is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Judges Bright, Arnold, Bowman, Wollman and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg and Beam would reverse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

/902/f2d/15 · .json · Public domain