Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 1565

Docket No. 90-6515.

David Randall Huggins v. Ernest R. Sutton, Superintendent Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 20, 1990. Decided April 24, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-04-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Haigler v. Evatt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-04-24

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Hiram H. Ward, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-578-C-R)

David Randall Huggins, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

David Randall Huggins seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Huggins v. Sutton, CA-89-578-C-R (M.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/902/f2d/1565 · .json · Public domain