Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 1565

Docket No. 89-7853.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Wayne S. Barry Paul A. Dorf Olga M. Bruning Donald F. Licato Donald Palmolo and Bataglia Paul S. Miller Paul Davis

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 29, 1990. Decided April 25, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-04-25

Relies on Haigler v. Evatt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-04-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 89-2900-B)

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to transfer. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nasim v. Barry, CA-89-2900-B (D.Md. Oct. 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/902/f2d/1565 · .json · Public domain