Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 1569

Docket No. 89-6253.

See v. Wilkinson

This page is marked noindex.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-05-11

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public Transportation · Wells v. Brown

Opinion by Charles Wycliffe Joiner · Decided 1990-05-11

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

¶1

Before KENNEDY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES W. JOINER, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

¶2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and appellant's brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

¶3

Gordon W. See appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. See alleged that his state court conviction is unlawful and sought only unspecified money damages. Defendants are the Governor and Commonwealth of Kentucky.

¶4

The magistrate recommended that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed and plaintiff filed a general objection. The district court adopted the magistrate's recommendation and dismissed the complaint. Upon consideration, we conclude that the dismissal was proper.

¶5

Plaintiff's allegation that his conviction is improper is merely a conclusion without any factual basis. Cf. Jones v. Duncan, 840 F.2d 359, 361 (6th Cir.1988); Chapman v. City of Detroit, 808 F.2d 459, 465 (6th Cir.1986). Further, the state is immune under the eleventh amendment from suit for damages. Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 472 (1987). Likewise, Governor Wilkinson is not subject to suit for damages under Sec. 1983 because he was not named in his individual capacity. See Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2311-12 (1989); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593-94 (6th Cir.1989). Thus, plaintiff's complaint is completely without merit.

¶6

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate's report and recommendation filed September 1, 1989, and adopted by the district court on September 22, 1989. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Charles W. Joiner, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

/902/f2d/1569 · .json · Public domain