Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 27

Docket No. 89-6040.

Crowell v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 2, 1990. Decided April 16, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mildred A. Barringer v. At & T Technologies, Inc.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-04-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-226-N)

Anthony Crowell, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Anthony Crowell appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Williams, C/A No. 88-226-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/902/f2d/27 · .json · Public domain