Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 28

Docket No. 89-6026.

Bruce Edward Goodwin v. David A. Williams, Warden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 21, 1990. Decided April 13, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied May 22, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-05-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Holsey v. Tilly

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-05-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-1214-AM)

Bruce Edward Goodwin, appellant pro se.

Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Bruce Edward Goodwin seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Goodwin v. Williams, C/A No. 88-1214-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/902/f2d/28 · .json · Public domain