Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 29

Docket No. 89-2812.

Myers v. Anders

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 22, 1990. Decided April 19, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-04-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Procup v. Strickland · Murray W. Kronick v. Bankers Life Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-04-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Karen L. Henderson, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1347-3-16)

Tony L.C. Myers, appellant pro se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Tony L.C. Myers appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Myers v. Anders, C/A No. 89-1347-3-16 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also agree that the district court properly ordered a pre-filing injunction, subject to conditions, on Myers' future complaints. See Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir.1986) (en banc)

/902/f2d/29 · .json · Public domain