United States v. Arvanitis’s Empirical Analysis
902 F.2d 489 · 1990
Citation profile
128 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Gordon (1993), Knight v. United States (1994)
128 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1202 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson · Bourjaily v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, [Jones] would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A mere allegation by the defendant that he would have insisted on going to trial is insufficient to establish prejudice.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense, the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.