Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 F.2d 805 - Banghart

Banghart’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2020

1 district · 5 state decisions

601990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1), an agreement among the parties leaves so little power in the hands of the partner or venturer that the arrangement in fact distributes power as would a limited partnership; or (2) the partner or venturer is so inexperienced and unknowledgeable in business affairs that he is incapable of intelligently exercising his partnership or venture powers; or (3) the partner or venturer is so dependent on some unique entrepreneurial or managerial ability of the promoter or manager that he cannot replace the manager of the -enterprise- or otherwise exercise. meaningful partnership, or venture powers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the scheme involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits to come solely from the efforts of others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “allocates powers to general partners that are specific and unambiguous” and provide those partners”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.