Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 F.2d 821

Docket Nos. 87-6015, 88-5274.

United States v. Tobin

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-05-16

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2015

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on United States v. Tobin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Samuel Burstyn, Robert F. Dunlap, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants.

¶2Leon B. Kellner, U.S. Atty., Dawn Bowen, Linda Collins Hertz, Edward Nucci, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶4ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶5Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.*

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of October 8, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

/902/f2d/821 · .json · Public domain