Byrd v. Pyle

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 25, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 18, 1990.

Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · 728 F. Supp. 1 - Byrd v. Pyle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1993), American Mining Congress v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1990)

14 federal appellate · 6 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Prior report: D.C.C., 728 F.Supp. 1.

Before EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is

¶2

ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

¶3

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.