Ramirez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
902 F.3d 764 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Reno v. Flores · 138 S. Ct. 2105 - Pereira v. Sessions · Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Paramasamy v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish prejudice, [Cardoza] must show 'the outcome of the proceeding may well have been different had there not been any procedural irregularities.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Salazar v. Barr“fails to raise a particular issue when he appeals to the Board, the petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to that issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Salazar v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.