Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 FSUPP 673 - Wilson v. Jones

Wilson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2012

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Shugrue · Latimer v. Stainer · Williams v. United States · Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the motion [to substitute] is filed, with the supporting certification, the plaintiff must come forward with competent, verified evidence, including affidavits, establishing that the defendant was not acting within the scope of his employment.” Wilson v. Jones, 902 F.Supp. 673, 679 (E.D.Va.1995); see Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 1 11 F.3d 1148, 1153-54 (4th Cir.1997).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prior to Westfall questions of official immunity were resolved through summary judgment or dismissal early in the case”)). 2 . Brittingham v. Green, Civil Action No. 97-875-A (Order, June 13, 1997). 3 . Section 2675(a) requires that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.