Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 N.E.2d 249 - In Re Marshall

In Re Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Chaffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] lawyer may not hold funds to which a client is indisputably entitled to coerce the client into accepting the lawyer's contention in a dispute over attorney fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.