Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 NW2D 448 - Burt v. Rackner, Inc.

Burt v. Rackner, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood · Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom · Lukens v. State · Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. · Christianson v. Henke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we 'consider only the facts alleged in the complaint, accepting those facts as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to determine whether 'the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “equipped to balance the competing interests of employers, employees, and the public”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.