Talbott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Stephens v. State · Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware) · Zabel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“issue of the prosecutor's opening statement. 6 See id. The court held that the prosecutor's comments did not constitute reversible error because the prosecutor had a good-faith belief that the evidence of Talbott's confession was available and admissible and also because any error in the comments was cured by the trial court's instructions to the jury. See id. at 722 . 6 Talbott filed this habeas petition on January 17, 1996, contending that his conviction was”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“obtained by use of illegally obtained statements (confession), in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.