State v. Ratner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(b) Jurisdiction of District Courts of Appeal. . . . . (4) Discretionary Review, See [ Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, ] 894 So.2d [202] at 211 [(Fla. 2005]). District courts of appeal, in their, discretion, may review by appeal . . . . (B) non-final orders, otherwise appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c), that the county court has certified to be of great public importance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ratner

2. “[a]lthough some provisions of section 924.07(1) have been adopted in rule 9.140(c) by the Florida Supreme Court, the portions relied upon by the State have not been adopted by rule and are unconstitutional as to appeals to district courts of appeal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ratner

3. “our constitution grants the power to authorize non-final appeals to district courts of appeal to our supreme court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ratner