902 So. 2d 389 - Chavers v. Travis’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 625 So. 2d 1002 - Lasha v. Olin Corp. · 579 So. 2d 429 - American Motorist v. American Rent-All · 650 So. 2d 757 - Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · 692 So. 2d 1029 - Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he standard for determining the causal relationship is whether plaintiff proved 'by a preponderance of the evidence through medical testimony that it is more probable than not that the subsequent injuries were caused by the accident.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under Louisiana law, ‘expert medical testimony is required when the conclusion regarding medical causation is one that is not within common knowledge.’ ”) (Vance, C.J.) (quoting Chavers v. Travis, 902 So.2d 389, 395 (La.App. 4 Cir.2005)). .The court in Davidson also reasoned that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.