Langham v. Wampol’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Baker v. Carr · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. · Davis v. Passman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Standing imparts justiciability to the issues raised. . . .'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`When a party without standing purports to commence an action, the trial court acquires no subject-matter jurisdiction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A void judgment will not support an appeal'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hannah v. Hannah
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.