Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Conner v. State · 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State · 786 So. 2d 372 - Sharp v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jury only determines the guilt of the accused on the principal offense and does not consider the prior convictions which bring into consideration the life sentence under the habitual[-]offender[ ] statute. The trial judge, in a separate hearing, determines the applicability of the habitual[-]offender[ ] statute and the sentencing. Thus, the special challenges to the jury allowed a defendant charged with a capital crime are not necessitated when the principal offense is noncapital.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foxworth v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.