Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 SO2D 720 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jeffers v. United States · Doss v. State · Gayden v. State · 529 So. 2d 1074 - Ross v. State · 38 Ala. App. 39 - Gayden v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the third degree if in the course of committing a theft he: "(1) Uses force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to overcome his physical resistance or physical power of resistance; or "(2) Threatens the imminent use of force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[o]n remand, while the State cannot retry Wright on a robbery-in-the-first-degree charge, it can reindict him on a charge of robbery-in-the-second-degree charge,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “defendant cannot consent to an amendment that effectively charges an offense not contemplated by the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.