Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 So. 2d 905

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-06-01

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2016

8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm without discussion Appellant’s convictions and sentence for burglary of a structure and grand theft upon revocation of his probation. The order of revocation shows violations of conditions one, four, five, twenty-seven, and thirty-six. At the revocation hearing, the trial court found that he had violated only conditions four and five. We therefore remand only for correction of the written order of revocation.

¶2Affirmed and remanded with instructions to amend the order of revocation.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
/902/so2d/905 · .json · Public domain