Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 S.W.2d 187 - State v. Kinkle

State v. Kinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2018

9 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 351st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. State · Brooks v. State · Cheney v. State · State v. Eversole · Rodriguez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If a general provision conflicts with a special or local provision, the provisions shall be construed, if possible, so that effect is given to both. (b) If the conflict between the general provision and the special or local provision is irreconcilable, the special or local provision prevails as an exception to the general provision, unless the general provision is the later enactment and the manifest intent is that the general provision prevail.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “with the intent to defraud and harm another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.