Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 902 SW2D 9 - Lindsey v. State

Lindsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2018

7 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Gainous v. State · Waddell v. Hon. Court of Appeals ex rel. First District of Texas · High v. State · Currie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. I have read the Court’s Admonishments and I hereby waive the right to have the trial court orally admonish me; 2. My attorney has explained the admonishments to me as well as all other documents which I have signed in the cause; 3. I am the same person who is charged by Indictment/Information in this cause with the offense of ... alleged to have occurred in Nueces County, Texas, on or about ...; 4. I, now in open Court, enter my Plea of Guilty to that offense. My Plea of Guilty is made voluntarily and made without force, threats, persuasion, fear, or promise. I enter my plea of guilty only because I am guilty as charged. ⅜ ⅜ ¾: ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ 10. I acknowledge and understand the admonishments given to me in writing by the Court; ... and I am aware of the consequences of my entering a Plea of Guilty in this cause. I want the Court to accept my Plea of Guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.