Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 A2D 65 - Allen v. COM., INS. DEPT.

Allen v. COM., INS. DEPT.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bass v. Commonwealth · Nayak v. Commonwealth · 130 Pa. Commw. 106 - Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority v. Commonwealth · Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Pennsylvania Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n · 163 Pa. Commw. 23 - Marconi v. Insurance Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “delay in notifying insurer until receipt of complaint was not excusable where reasonable and prudent insured would have concluded a strong possibility existed that a liability claim would arise prior to actual filing of complaint). Judge PELLEGRINI joins in this dissent. NOTES [1] Act of March 20, 2002, P.L. 154, No. 13, as amended, 40 P.S. §§ 1303.101-1303.1115. [2] The parties in the present appeal filed a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which resolved all factual issues and was submitted in lieu of a hearing. (A & O at 2.) [3]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is limited to whether the adjudication violates constitutional rights, is not in accordance with agency procedure or with applicable law, or any finding of fact necessary to support the adjudication is not based upon substantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The MCARE fund assumed [the CAT Fund's] money, rights, liabilities and obligations. See Section 712(b) of the MCARE Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.712(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.