Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

903 F.2d 1014

Docket No. 88-2168.

Graham v. Collins

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 4, 1990.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Puckett v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc. · Graham v. Collins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-06-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Fields v. City of South Houston (1991), Graham v. Collins (1992)

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

200199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Douglas M. O'Brien, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

Robert S. Walt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; David Hittner, District Judge Presiding.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 7, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 896 F.2d 893)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/903/f2d/1014 · .json · Public domain