Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 F.2d 1240 - United States v. Guy

United States v. Guy’s Empirical Analysis

903 F.2d 1240 · 1990

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Koon (1994), United States v. Garcia (1993)

38 federal appellate · 6 district ·

680199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Payton v. New York · Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · Heath v. Alabama · United States v. Stewart · United States v. Feliz-Cordero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the second prosecution, otherwise permissible under the dual sovereignty rule, is not pursued to vindicate the separate interests of the second sovereign, but is merely pursued as a sham on behalf of the sovereign first to prosecute, it may be subject to a successful double jeopardy challenge.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “strategically located so as to be quickly and easily available for use during [a drug] transaction.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he prohibition against twice being placed in jeopardy does not foreclose a second prosecution by a different sovereign for the same offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.