Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 903 F.2d 1313 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

903 F.2d 1313 · 1990

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Jackson (1990), United States v. Cage (2006)

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

4001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Mistretta v. United States · United States v. DiFrancesco · Scharffe v. Perkins · Nicholas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The recidivist's relapse into the same criminal behavior reveals his lack of recognition of the gravity of his original wrong, entails greater culpability for the offense with which he is currently charged, and suggests an increased likelihood that the offense will be repeated again.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'4A1.3 permits information about the ... similarity of past conduct underlying prior convictions to be used as a basis for imposing a sentence outside the applicable guideline range.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “reflect a defendant who has shown himself to be, in reality, a recidivous criminal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.