Leiser v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
903 F.3d 1137 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Paul v. Davis · Whalen v. Roe · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services · White v. Pauly · Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made clear that any statements in its precedents regarding a constitutional protection against government disclosure of personal information were dicta.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Supreme Court has made clear that the existence of such a right [to informational privacy] is an open question and it has not abandoned a third precedent which suggests that any right to informational privacy is limited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Kobach“[The Second Circuit] declared that 'the interest in the privacy of medical information will vary with the condition' " (quoting Matson , 631 F.3d at 64 ) ). By concluding that the law was not "clearly established”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Kobach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.