Campbell v. Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis
903 F.3d 14 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No v. Superline Transportation Company Inc · Charles Clauson v. Robert D. Smith · Real v. Hogan · Barnes v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply does not allow a litigant to switch horses in mid-stream, abandoning theories and arguments raised in the trial court and substituting in their place new ones raised for the first time in the court of appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is settled law that when liability has been resolved against a plaintiff, any claims of error relating exclusively to damages are moot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“made in a cursory manner bereft of any developed rationale”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.